Resource material › Corporate Publications › Annual Report 2012-13Pūrongo ā Tau
Part B: Service Performance
- Previous – Part A: Contribution to Outcomes and Objectives
- Table of Contents
- Next – Part C: Financial Statements – Departmental
On this page
This section summarises our performance against the performance measures set out in the Information Supporting the Estimates of Appropriations.
Statement of Responsibility
As Secretary for Internal Affairs I am responsible, under the Public Finance Act 1989, for the preparation of the Financial Statements, the Statement of Service Performance, and the judgements made in the process of producing those statements.
The Department has a system of internal control and this has provided reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of financial reporting. In my opinion the Financial Statements and Statement of Service Performance fairly reflect the financial position and operations of the Department of Internal Affairs for the year ended 30 June 2013.
Colin MacDonald
Chief Executive
September 2013
Shirley Smith
Chief Financial Officer
September 2013
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the readers of The Department of Internal Affairs’ financial statements, non-financial performance information and schedules of non departmental activities for the year ended 30 June 2013
The Auditor General is the auditor of the Department of Internal Affairs (the Department). The Auditor General has appointed me, Clare Helm, using the staff and resources of Audit New Zealand, to carry out the audit of the financial statements, the non financial performance information and the schedules of non-departmental activities of the Department on her behalf.
We have audited:
- the financial statements of the Department in Part C: 2012/13 Financial Statements - Departmental, comprising the statement of financial position, statement of commitments, statement of contingent assets and liabilities as at 30 June 2013, the statement of comprehensive income, statement changes in equity, statement of departmental expenditure and capital appropriations, statement of unappropriated expenditure and capital expenditure and statement of cash flows for the year ended on that date and the notes to the financial statements that include accounting policies and other explanatory information;
- the non-financial performance information of the Department comprising Part B: Service Performance, and sections of Part A: Contribution to Outcomes and Objectives – our outcomes and objectives, contributing to outcomes and contributing to objectives; and
- the schedules of non-departmental activities of the Department in Part D: Financial Statements – Non-Departmental, comprising the schedule of non-departmental assets, schedule of non-departmental liabilities and revaluation reserves, non-departmental commitments and schedule of non-departmental contingent assets and liabilities as at 30 June 2013, the statement of non-departmental expenditure, capital expenditure against appropriations, schedule of non-departmental unappropriated expenditure and capital expenditure, schedule of non-departmental revenue, schedule of non-departmental expenditure and schedule of trust money administered on behalf of the Crown, for the year ended on that date and the notes to the schedules that include accounting policies and other explanatory information.
Opinion
In our opinion:
- the financial statements of the Department in Part C: 2012/13 Financial Statements – Departmental:
- comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and
- fairly reflect the Department’s:
- financial position as at 30 June 2013;
- financial performance and cash flows for the year ended on that date;
- expenses and capital expenditure incurred against each appropriation administered by the Department and each class of outputs included in each output expense appropriation for the year ended 30 June 2013; and
- unappropriated expenses and capital expenditure for the year ended 30 June 2013.
- the non financial performance information of the Department in Part B: Service Performance, and sections of Part A: Contribution to Outcomes and Objectives - our outcomes and objectives, contributing to outcomes and contributing to objectives:
- complies with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and
- fairly reflects the Department’s service performance, outcomes and objectives for the year ended 30 June 2013, including for each class of outputs:
- its service performance compared with the forecasts in the statement of forecast service performance at the start of the financial year; and
- its actual revenue and output expenses compared with the forecasts in the statement of forecast service performance at the start of the financial year.
- the schedules of non departmental activities of the Department in Part D: Financial Statements – Non-Departmental:
- comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand; and
- fairly reflect:
- the assets, liabilities, contingencies, commitments and trust monies as at 30 June 2013 managed by the Department on behalf of the Crown; and
- the revenues, expenses, expenditure and capital expenditure against appropriations and unappropriated expenditure and capital expenditure for the year ended on that date managed by the Department on behalf of the Crown.
Our audit was completed on 13 September 2013. This is the date at which our opinion is expressed.
The basis of our opinion is explained below. In addition, we outline the responsibilities of the Chief Executive and our responsibilities, and we explain our independence.
Basis of opinion
We carried out our audit in accordance with the Auditor-General’s Auditing Standards, which incorporate the International Standards on Auditing (New Zealand). Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and carry out our audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements, the non-financial performance information and the schedules of non-departmental activities are free from material misstatement.
Material misstatements are differences or omissions of amounts and disclosures that would affect a reader’s overall understanding of the financial statements, the non-financial performance information and the schedules of non-departmental activities. If we had found material misstatements that were not corrected, we would have referred to them in our opinion.
An audit involves carrying out procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, the non-financial performance information and the schedules of non-departmental activities. The procedures selected depend on our judgement, including our assessment of risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, the non-financial performance information and the schedules of non-departmental activities, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the Department’s preparation of the financial statements, the non-financial performance information and the schedules of non-departmental activities that fairly reflect the matters to which they relate. We consider internal control in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Department’s internal control.
An audit also involves evaluating:
- the appropriateness of accounting policies used and whether they have been consistently applied;
- the reasonableness of the significant accounting estimates and judgements made by the Chief Executive;
- the appropriateness of the reported non-financial performance information within the Department’s framework for reporting performance;
- the adequacy of all disclosures in the financial statements, the non-financial performance information and the schedules of non-departmental activities; and
- the overall presentation of the financial statements, the non-financial performance information and the schedules of non-departmental activities.
We did not examine every transaction, nor do we guarantee complete accuracy of the financial statements, the non-financial performance information and the schedules of non-departmental activities. We have obtained all the information and explanations we have required and we believe we have obtained sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Responsibilities of the Chief Executive
The Chief Executive is responsible for preparing:
- financial statements and non-financial performance information that:
- comply with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand;
- fairly reflect the Department’s financial position, financial performance, cash flows, expenses and capital expenditure incurred against each appropriation and its unappropriated expenses and capital expenditure; and
- fairly reflect its service performance and outcomes; and
- schedules of non-departmental activities, in accordance with the Treasury Instructions that fairly reflect those activities managed by the Department on behalf of the Crown.
The Chief Executive is also responsible for such internal control as is determined is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements, and non-financial performance information and schedules of non-departmental activities that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
The Chief Executive is also responsible for the publication of the financial statements, non-financial performance information and schedules of non-departmental activities, whether in printed or electronic form.
The Chief Executive’s responsibilities arise from the Public Finance Act 1989.
Responsibilities of the Auditor
We are responsible for expressing an independent opinion on the financial statements, the non-financial performance information and the schedules of non-departmental activities and reporting that opinion to you based on our audit. Our responsibility arises from section 15 of the Public Audit Act 2001 and the Public Finance Act 1989.
Independence
When carrying out the audit, we followed the independence requirements of the Auditor-General, which incorporate the independence requirements of the External Reporting Board.
In addition to the audit we have carried out an assignment witnessing the Passport Key Generation Ceremonies, which is compatible with those independence requirements. Other than the audit and this assignment, we have no relationship with or interests in the Department.
Clare Helm
Audit New Zealand
On behalf of the Auditor-General
Wellington, New Zealand
Introduction
This section summarises our performance against the measures set out in the Information Supporting the Estimates of Appropriations for each of the portfolios in Vote Internal Affairs.
The links between the Department’s outcomes and objectives, and Output Appropriations are provided in Appendix II.
We have assessed whether we met the standards associated with each output, and have provided an explanation where there is a significant difference between the standard and what we achieved. We have also included comparable information from 2011/12 where possible.
Note on definitions used for output performance measures
The following section includes measures of performance and measures of activity:
- Performance information relates to output performance dimensions such as quality and timeliness that are within the Department’s control.
- Activity information relates to output volume measures that are demand driven and therefore outside the Department’s control.
Portfolio Index
The table below provides an index of performance measures within the seven portfolios supported by the Department of Internal Affairs.
Vote Internal Affairs
Output Appropriation: Administration of Grants
Under this appropriation we administer the processes supporting government grant funding schemes, from receiving applications to monitoring grant recipients.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[43] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 3,666 | 3,752 | 3,752 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 23 | 23 | – | |
Total Revenue | 3,689 | 3,775 | 3,752 | |
Expenses | 3,689 | 3,775 | 3,588 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 164 |
The increase in the budget between Main Estimates and Supplementary Estimates of $86,000 was due to an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $119,000). This was partially offset by a transfer of funding from 2012/13 to 2013/14 as a result of efficiency gains in 2012/13 (decrease of $33,000).
Actual expenditure was five per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates, primarily due to delays in delivery of the Grants and Client Management System project. An in-principle expense transfer up to a maximum of $0.225 million to 2013/14 was approved.
Output: Grants Administration – Crown
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Community Organisation Grants Scheme (COGS) | |||
Eligible grant applications processed and presented to Local Distribution Committees for decision within agreed timeframes | At least 95% (of 4,600–5,300) | 100% (of 5,106) | 100% (of 5,286) |
Grant distribution committee procedures and decisions reviewed (sample-based) – consistent with requirements and guiding principles | At least 95% of 4–5% for each committee | Achieved for 5% of each committee | Achieved for 5% of each committee |
Payments made to grant recipients within 20 days of approval | At least 95% (of 3,800–4,800) | 99.9% (of 4,254) | 98.9% (of 4,323) |
Crown Community Grants Schemes (excl COGS) | |||
Grant applications processed from receipt to notification of decision within agreed timeframes | At least 95% (of 190–230) | 100% (of 121) | 100% (of 195) |
Payments made to grant recipients within 20 days of approval | At least 95% (of 190–230) | 100% (of 82) | 100% (of 214) |
All grant funding schemes | |||
Grants are made in accordance with the purpose of the fund and eligibility criteria | At least 99% | 100% | 100% (of 112) |
Online information on grant funding opportunities and applications processes current:
|
At least once annually | 100% (of 5) | Achieved |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Application levels for grant schemes (Other Expense Appropriations) administered:
|
Combined: 190–230 | 119 | 206 |
Community Organisation Grants Scheme ($12.500 million) | 4,600–5,300 | 4,636 | 5,514 |
Multi-class Output Appropriation: Civic Information Services
Output Appropriation: Managing and Accessing Identity Information
Under this output class we provide effective management of New Zealand’s records of identity including: issuing New Zealand passports; processing citizenship applications; registering births, deaths, marriages and civil unions; developing authorised information-matching programmes with specified government agencies; providing data or data verification to government agencies to enhance border processes and facilitate travel; working across government to develop systems and processes for the verification and authentication of identity and to facilitate good practice based on Evidence of Identity Standard; authenticating official documents and coordinating the congratulatory message service.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[44] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 21,530 | 22,584 | 22,584 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 104,973 | 105,867 | 104,631 | |
Total Revenue | 126,503 | 128,451 | 127,215 | |
Expenses | 133,709 | 135,843 | 127,064 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | (7,206) | (7,392) | 151 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $2.134 million was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (increase of $1.474 million), the recovery of business continuity expenditure relating to the Canterbury earthquakes (increase of $387,000), an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for amendments to the igovt New Zealand Post Partnering Agreement (increase of $200,000), and demand for Authentication Services (increase of $73,000).
Actual expenditure was six per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates, primarily due to lower than anticipated demand for Passport products which resulted in lower cost of goods sold and delays in igovt work programme. An in-principle expense transfer up to a maximum of $1.500 million to 2013/14 was approved for igovt.
Output: Citizenship
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Applications for grant of citizenship to foreign nationals recommended to the Minister within 4 months of receipt of correct applications | At least 90% (of 21,000–25,000) | 98.3% (of 25,354) | 97.96% (of 27,609) |
Applications for registration of citizenship, not involving adoption, processed within 20 days of receipt of correct applications | At least 95% (of 7,000–9,500) | 99.3% (of 9,331) | 97.17% (of 10,197) |
Certificates of citizenship status issued within 15 days of receipt | At least 95% (of 2,500–4,000) | 99% (of 3,669) | 95.98% (of 2,072) |
Citizenship documents issued without error | At least 99% (of 31,500–38,000) | 99.8% (of 34,685) | 99.67% (of 37,806) |
Customer satisfaction with the citizenship service received[45] | At least 85% assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Not measured | 89% |
Output: Passports
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Passports, certificates and other travel documents issued without error | At least 99% | 99.9% | 99.95% |
Passports issued within stated timeframes of receipt of correct applications | |||
standard passports – within 10 days |
At least 99% (of 549,000–619,000) | 99.9% (of 557,473) | 99.99% (of 570,506) |
urgent passports – within 3 days |
At least 99% (of 45,000–55,000) | 99.9% (of 45,898) | 99.95% (of 45,078) |
Customer satisfaction with the passport service received[46] | At least 85% assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Not measured | 91% |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Other travel documents issued | 1,200–1,600 | 1,385 | 1,367 |
Output: Births, Deaths, Marriages and Civil Unions
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Registration of birth, death, marriage and civil union information: | |||
accuracy – issued without error |
At least 99% | 99.8% | 99.83% |
timeliness (deaths) – registered within 3 days of receipt of correct notifications |
At least 99% (of 27,000–31,000) | 99.8% (of 29,991) | 99.85% (of 30,163) |
timeliness (births, marriages and civil unions) – registered within 4 days of receipt of correct notifications or applications |
At least 99% (of 80,000–89,000) | 99.9% (of 85,215) | 99.78% (of 84,049) |
Birth, death, marriage and civil union certificates: | |||
issued without error |
At least 99% (of 220,000–250,000) | 99.8% (of 267,456) | 99.8% (of 268,010) |
timeliness (fully computerised registrations) – issued within 1 day of receipt of correct applications |
At least 99% | 99.6% | 99.77% |
timeliness (partially computerised registrations) – issued within 8 days of receipt of correct applications |
At least 98% | 99.9% | 99.87% |
Birth, death, marriage and civil union printouts issued within 8 days of receipt of correct application | At least 98% (of 25,000–35,000) | 99.9% (of 31,669) | 99.88% (of 31,609) |
Customer satisfaction with the birth, death, marriage and civil union service received[47] | At least 85% assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Not measured | 90% |
Output: Identity and Authentication Services
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
New igovt service integrations initiated with public sector agencies: igovt logon and identity verification services | 10–15 | 12 | 10 |
New igovt logons created | 150,000–200,000 | 171,317 | 552,025* |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Availability of the igovt online services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (supporting 2.7m transactions) | At least 99% | 99.9% (supporting 1.5–2.0m transactions) | 99.97% (of 7.9m transactions) |
- *
- The increased number of logons and transactions was primarily due to the Ministry of Social Development’s StudyLink joining the igovt logon service, which brought an estimated over 300,000 users.
Output: Authentications Unit and Congratulatory Message Service
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Timeliness – delivered within agreed timeframes: | |||
authentications |
At least 98% (of 15,000–17,000) | 99.9% (of 19,115) | 99.99% (of 20,716) |
congratulatory message requests |
At least 98% (of 1,100–1,200) | 100% (of 1,587) | 100% (of 1,671) |
Accuracy – authentication confirmations and congratulatory messages returned by customers as inaccurate | No more than 1% | Authentications: 0.2% Congratulatory: 0.01% |
Authentications: 0.01% Congratulatory: 0.017% |
Output Appropriation: Managing and Accessing Knowledge Information
Under this appropriation we manage public archives in both physical and digital formats on behalf of the Crown, and enable the public to access archives held by Archives New Zealand. We provide services which assist access to library collections and other information, collect and preserve published and unpublished items for the National Library and Alexander Turnbull Library collections, provide information services and products to schools in support of the National Curriculum, and administer the Public Lending Right for New Zealand Authors scheme.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[48] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 78,426 | 80,965 | 80,964 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 6,461 | 7,970 | 7,185 | |
Total Revenue | 84,887 | 88,935 | 88,149 | |
Expenses | 84,402 | 88,808 | 87,440 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | 485 | 127 | 709 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $4.406 million was due to expense transfers from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for Aotearoa People’s Network Kaharoa (increase of $400,000); digital preservation (increase of $200,000); digitisation and distribution of motion picture film and stills (increase of $162,000); digitisation of New Zealand Defence Force service records (increase of $162,000); digitisation of records (increase of $75,000); finding aids and retrospective cataloguing (increase of $100,000); the Government Digital Archive project (increase of $203,000); the New Generation Implementation Programme (increase of $2.295 million); an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $285,000); refreshed services to libraries (increase of $100,000); the National Library and Archives New Zealand Strategic Partnership Programme (increase of $200,000) and transformation of services to schools (increase of $100,000); demand for broadband Internet services provided by public libraries (increase of $480,000), Kōtui (increase of $1.238 million); opt-in services from the license package of electronic resources available to libraries in New Zealand on subscription (increase of $270,000) and Collaborative Digitisation services (increase of $190,000); the recovery of business continuity expenditure relating to the Canterbury earthquakes (increase of $469,000); and a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (increase of $225,000).
The increases were partially offset by expense transfers from 2012/13 to 2013/14 for the National Library and Archives New Zealand Strategic Partnership Programme (decrease of $410,000); Government Digital Archive project (decrease of $100,000) and National Library Service Reviews (decrease of $1.100 million); demand for services provided by the National Library (decrease of $1.065 million); and the cost of the online homework and research service provided by the National Library (decrease of $73,000).
Actual expenditure was lower than the Supplementary Estimates by $1.368 million primarily due to delays in the Government Digital Archive Project, National Archives Service Reviews and Digitisation of New Zealand Defence Force Records. In-principle expense transfers up to a maximum of $4.500 million to 2013/14 were approved.
Output: National Archives – Managing Public Archives
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Accession of transfers received from public offices completed – linear metres (LM) | 1,000–2,000LM | 2,405LM (from 84 transfers) | 900.4LM* (from 71 transfers) |
Pages (or similar) of archives items digitised | 200,000–240,000 | 781,607 | 706,462** |
Storage environments maintained to required standards 24 hours a day, 7 days a week | At least 80% | 80.6% temperature 67.1% relative humidity |
84.43% temperature 76.64% relative humidity |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Archives held in storage:
|
99,000–102,000LM | 103,327LM | 104,227LM |
- *
- Transfers have been lower than expected. The inability of the Christchurch office to accept transfers currently affects this measure, and priority has been given to reviewing appraisal policy settings rather than transfers. Public offices have a high level of discretion over whether they wish to make transfers of archives or not, so the number of transfers can fluctuate considerably from year to year.
- **
- Due to the increasing volume of material to be digitised the performance standard for this measure has been increased for 2013/14.
Output: National Archives – Provision of Access to Public Archives
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Responses to reference requests provided within standard timeframes: | |||
reading rooms: 1 hour |
At least 95% (52,000–58,000) | 93% (of 47,869) | 92.04% (of 46,696)* |
remote: 15 working days |
At least 95% (13,000–16,000) | 95.6% (of 14,152) | 96.55% (of 13,022) |
Availability of online services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week | At least 99% | 98.1% | 97.79%** |
Copies of archives newly made available online | 30,000–50,000 | 39,825 | 13,986*** |
- *
- The small variance is largely due to having retrieval staff vacancies, which affected the speed of delivery of archives to the reading room.
- **
- There was a slightly higher than expected level of downtime for the Archives New Zealand website and online services.
- ***
- 31,596 items have been digitised and are awaiting online publication. Issues relating to ingest of items has impacted publication rates. The ingest issues will be fully resolved by the development of a surrogate storage facility that allows for ingest of JPEG2000 images. This will be completed before the end of 2013 and the backlog of digitised items will become available online.
Output: National Library – Access to Information
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Requests (non-school) for the off-site supply of documents – completed within 2 days of receipt | At least 90% (of 10,000–15,000) | 93% (of 12,378) | 98% (of 12,490) |
Public Lending Right payments to authors eligible for payment made within the timeframe stipulated by regulation | All (of 1,800–1,900) | 99% (of 1,666) | 99% (of 1,702)* |
Catalogue records for newly published material available online within 15 days of receipt | At least 90% (of 20,000–25,000) | 84% (of 23,116) | 87% (of 27,575)** |
Digitised items newly available for access online | At least 450,000 | 756,052 | 660,535 |
Availability of Te Puna catalogue and interloan services to subscribers 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (to support 6.5m–7.5m transactions) | At least 95% | 99% | 99% |
Availability of online services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week | At least 95% | 99% | 99% |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
New Zealand libraries participating in Te Puna (catalogue and interloan services) | 92% (of 250–255) | 92% (of 264) | 91.4% (of 257)*** |
Interloan requests made through Te Puna | 80,000–90,000 | 87,092 | 86,112 |
Visits to National Library reading rooms | 80,000–90,000 | 36,829 | 72,095**** |
- *
- Five payments out of 1,702 were not made within the timeframe stipulated by regulation due to errors within the Public Lending Right system which created incomplete registrations. A report has now been established and linked into the payment system. Payments are now made within the required timeframe.
- **
- Intake of material was 22% higher than forecast and a high staff turnover has impacted the cataloguing process of these materials. The Department expects to meet this target in 2013/14.
- ***
- The closure and merging of libraries during the year and the reduction in services from libraries impacted by the Christchurch earthquake have reduced the number of libraries able to participate in Te Puna.
- ****
- The performance standard for visitors to National Library reading rooms is based on visitor numbers prior to the National Library’s redevelopment. Visitor numbers dropped while users waited for the redeveloped building to be reopened in November 2012. The Department expects the target to be met in 2013/14.
Output: National Library – Collecting and Preserving Information
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Of the acquisitions to the Alexander Turnbull Library (new heritage items): | |||
accession records for unpublished items – completed within 10 days of receipt |
At least 95% (of 1,000–1,500) | 98% (of 5,586) | 82% (of 8,329)* |
descriptive records for unpublished items – added within 20 days of accession |
At least 95% (of 1,000–1,500) | 98% (of 5,586) | 87% (of 8,329)** |
‘At risk’ items digitised or digital formats transformed | At least 390 | 1,450 | 780 |
Microfilm frames of ‘at-risk’ newspapers created as part of the Newspaper Preservation Programme | At least 250,000 | 308,457 | 250,795 |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Acquisitions to the Alexander Turnbull Library (new heritage items) | 65,000–75,000 | 68,967 | 66,190 |
Records added to the information system for unpublished items | 18,000–28,000 | 80,395 | 37,197 |
- *
- The performance standard for accession records was unable to be met due to higher than forecast volumes, which impacted on the ability to complete all accession records within 10 days. In addition to this, assessment, appraisal and cleaning processes needed to be completed prior to accession on a number of records. The performance standard has been revised for 2013/14 to take these factors into account.
- **
- The target for completing descriptive records was not met due to higher than forecast volumes of complex acquisitions, which require considerable time to process, and collections requiring preservation treatment before they can be arranged and described.
Output: National Library – Library and Information Services to Schools
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Requests for the supply of: | |||
items from the schools collections met within 5 days of receipt |
At least 75% (of 35,000–40,000) | 88% (of 35,389) | 84% (of 35,031) |
documents from the general collection (off-site) met within 4 days of receipt |
At least 95% (of 14,000–19,000) | 99% (of 14,295) | 99% (of 11,509) |
Advisory support provided to targeted schools | At least 75% (of 750–850) | 96% (of 800) | 83% (of 800) |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Items supplied on request from the schools collection | 900,000-950,000 | 883,488 | 888,411* |
- *
- Demand for hard copy items supplied from the schools collection is decreasing slightly, while online services visits are increasing.
Output Appropriation: Publishing Civic Information
Under this appropriation we publish the New Zealand Gazette.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[49] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 277 | – | – | |
Revenue Third Parties | 367 | 1,000 | 930 | |
Total Revenue | 644 | 1,000 | 930 | |
Expenses | 935 | 1,101 | 1,022 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | (291) | (101) | (92) |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $166,000 was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (increase of $319,000). This was partially offset by the capitalisation of Gazette Online project costs (decrease of $153,000).
Actual expenditure was seven per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to delays in the New Zealand Gazette online publishing project.
Output: New Zealand Gazette
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Accuracy – notices published consistent with text supplied by clients | At least 99% (of 8,000–10,000) | 99.9% (of 8,479) | 99.99% (of 8,454) |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Issues of the New Zealand Gazette published each year | 200 (1–140 pages each) | 186 | 159* |
- *
- The total number of issues is partly driven by demand for unique ad-hoc Gazette supplements, which is outside the control of the Gazette Office. In 2012/13 the demand was lower than forecast.
Multi-class Output Appropriation: Community Information and Advisory Services
Output Appropriation: Advisory and Information Services to Ethnic Communities
Under this appropriation we provide advisory and information services to ethnic communities; operational and secretariat support for grant funding bodies; management of the contract for the telephone interpreting service (Language Line); and provision of information and training to ethnic communities and agencies using Language Line.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[50] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 3,941 | 4,025 | 4,025 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 1,135 | 1,250 | 1,238 | |
Total Revenue | 5,076 | 5,275 | 5,263 | |
Expenses | 5,126 | 5,275 | 5,163 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | (50) | – | 127 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $149,000 was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (increase of $57,000), an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $54,000), a reallocation of shared services costs (increase of $30,000), and demand for Language Line services (increase of $8,000).
Output: Advisory and Information Services to Ethnic Communities
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Intercultural Awareness and Communication programme: training sessions, including train the trainers sessions, held | 15–20 (400–450 participants) | 34 (422 participants) | 32 (457 participants) |
Forums and workshops for ethnic communities held | 30–40 (600–650 participants) | 40 (1,537 participants) | 42 (980 participants) |
Respondent satisfaction with the quality of advisory services provided | At least 95% assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | 96% | 96% |
Interpreting clients connected with an appropriate interpreter within 2 minutes of a call to Language Line | At least 95% (of 40,000–42,000) | 98.8% (of 38,837) | 98.91% (of 49,038) |
Responses to requests from communities, local and central government, and NGOs for information or advice | 11,000–12,500 | 14,692 | 12,879 |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Agencies with agreements for the provision of telephone interpreting services through Language Line | 85 | 83 | 96 |
Output Appropriation: Community Development and Engagement Advice
Under this appropriation we provide advisory services to assist and guide community development activities and to assist government agencies to engage and interact with communities and community groups.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[51] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 5,941 | 5,692 | 5,692 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 45 | 45 | – | |
Total Revenue | 5,986 | 5,737 | 5,692 | |
Expenses | 5,986 | 5,737 | 5,688 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 4 |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $249,000 was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (decrease of $383,000), and transfer of funding from 2012/13 to 2013/14 as a result of efficiency gains in 2012/13 (decrease of $18,000), and was partially offset by an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $152,000).
Output: Community Development and Engagement Advice
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Community Advisory Projects: completed, with overall objectives achieved | At least 90% (of 45–55) | 100% (of 45) | 100% (of 53) |
Community Advisory Projects: underway during the year (including those completed) | 70–90 | Achieved (of 76) | 140* |
Community Advisory Activities: relevance – seminars/workshops provided address government and regional priorities | All (of 80–100) | All (of 94) | All (of 373)** |
Community Advisory Activities: participation – attendees and groups represented | 1,800–2,000 attendees from 500–700 groups | 3,165 from 1,763 groups | 2,077 from 1,665 groups** |
- *
- The Department exceeded its target, which is a reflection of the increased community development project work undertaken in communities, including through Community-led Development initiatives. This work is a result of the targeted approach the Department undertook in priority-setting against regional profiles in the previous year, and it continues to be an area of growth.
- **
- In this financial year, Community-led Development initiatives have changed the way the Department delivers our community development and engagement advice, allowing us to reach far greater numbers of residents and families alongside organisations. This has resulted in both increased relevance and participation in our community events.
Output Appropriation: Community Archives Support
Under this appropriation we provide support for community, iwi and hapū organisations and other jurisdictions in preserving, managing, and making their own records and archives publicly available.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[52] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 795 | 69 | 69 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 31 | 31 | 6 | |
Total Revenue | 826 | 100 | 75 | |
Expenses | 826 | 100 | 123 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | (48) |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $726,000 was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings.
Actual expenditure was 23 per cent higher than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to higher than anticipated costs associated with record keeping capability development that resulted in higher professional fees.
Output: Community Archives Support
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Availability of the online descriptive tool 24 hours a day, 7 days a week | At least 99% | 99.6% | 99.8% |
Quality review of new entries to the online descriptive tool completed within 5 days | At least 80% (of 100–150) | 100% (of 975) | 71.35% (of 370)* |
- *
- Actual volumes were more than double what was forecast, which has impacted on the five-day turnaround time for this measure. The review is primarily an administrative process to remove spam and obvious errors, rather than a value-add process. While this work will continue, it is not a good indicator of the value of the community archives support function. The drivers for this measure are no longer relevant and therefore the measure is being discontinued.
Output Appropriation: Community Information – Civil Defence Emergency Management
Under this appropriation we develop and deliver long-term national programmes to raise individual and community awareness and preparedness.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[53] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 1,696 | 1,611 | 1,611 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | 23 | 26 | |
Total Revenue | 1,696 | 1,634 | 1,637 | |
Expenses | 1,696 | 1,634 | 1,570 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 67 |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $62,000 was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (decrease of $107,000). This was partially offset by the provision of services to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade for disaster risk management support for the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and disaster risk management support for Pacific Island Countries (increase of $23,000), and an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $22,000).
Output: Community Information – Civil Defence Emergency Management
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Advertising reaches the targeted audience demographic (assessed quarterly): | |||
television – at least 70% |
Achieved – for at least 3 quarters | Achieved | Not achieved* |
radio – at least 45% |
Achieved – for at least 3 quarters | Achieved | Not achieved* |
Availability of the civil defence website 24 hours a day, 7 days a week | At least 99.9% | 100% | 99.91% |
- *
- The Department has not achieved standards for reaching the target audience this year, which we believe may have been influenced by new technologies available to viewers that enable them to skip advertisements. The Department is investigating new indicators that better reflect how new technologies and new media (such as social media and web advertising) may be used to reach a wider audience.
Output Appropriation: Contestable Services (RDA)
Under this appropriation we provide translation and other language services to government agencies and the public, and support services to government agencies.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[54] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
0 | Revenue Crown | – | – | – |
848 | Revenue Third Parties | 901 | 901 | 896 |
848 | Total Revenue | 901 | 901 | 896 |
841 | Expenses | 904 | 901 | 888 |
7 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | (3) | – | 8 |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $3,000 was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and application of efficiency savings.
Output: Translation Services
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Translations provided within timeframes agreed with service providers | At least 99% (of 6,500–7,500) | 99.3% (of 7,616) | 99.45% (of 8,050) |
Customer satisfaction with the quality of translation services provided[55] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’or better (at least 99%) | 92% | 95%* |
- *
- The survey received 82 responses from a sample size of 284. The survey sample size is too small for a change of 1–2% to be a clear representation of the overall number of customers. In addition, official document translations are not an end in themselves, and satisfaction is influenced by a number of factors outside the Department’s control – for example, government authorities may refuse to accept the translation for reasons not associated with quality. The Department is currently reviewing this measure.
Multi-class Output Appropriation: Emergency Management Services
Output Appropriation: Management of National Emergency Readiness, Response and Recovery
Through this appropriation we manage national emergency readiness, response and recovery. This includes supporting local civil defence emergency management organisations, maintaining the readiness of the National Crisis Management Centre and national training and education. We coordinate and manage central government’s response and recovery activities and the administration of related expenses.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[56] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 4,052 | 3,961 | 3,961 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | 86 | 97 | |
Total Revenue | 4,052 | 4,047 | 4,058 | |
Expenses | 4,052 | 4,047 | 4,235 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | (177) |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $5,000 was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (decrease of $107,000). This was partially offset by the provision of services to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade for disaster risk management support for the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, disaster risk management support for Pacific Island Countries (increase of $86,000), and an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $16,000).
Actual expenditure was five per cent higher than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to higher than anticipated costs of personnel due to vacant positions being covered by contractors.
Output: Management of National Emergency Management Readiness, Response and Recovery
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
National Warning System tests conducted | At least 4 | 4 | 4 |
National warnings issued within 30 minutes after the notification of a pending event that exceeds the thresholds | All (of 1–6) | All (of 4) | All (of 1) |
National warning distribution list – accuracy of contact details (at each warning or test) | At least 95% | 99.5% | 96% |
Stakeholder satisfaction with the timing and content of national warning messages[57] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better by at least 85% (of 200) | 80.5% | 63%* |
National Crisis Management Centre (NCMC) managed, during activations, with: | |||
staffing in place according to the activation mode within 2 hours |
All | 100% | All |
essential information technology systems available and operating at agreed performance levels |
All | 50% | Not achieved** |
back-up information technology systems and equipment fully functional |
At least 99.8% | 100% | 100% |
coordination and management consistent with the Response Concept of Operations for extended activations |
All (no variations) | No extended activations in 2011/12 | No extended activations in 2012/13 |
National Crisis Management Centre activations reviewed: | |||
mode 2 or higher activations – within 3 months |
All | Achieved (2 reviews) | All (1 review) |
approved recommendations (lessons identified) actioned – within set timeframes |
All | Achieved | All |
- *
- While stakeholder satisfaction with national warning messages did not meet our expectations, 85% of survey respondents thought performance was better than in the previous year. There were fewer national warning messages issued this year than in previous periods, which might have resulted in less familiarity with the process. The Department will undertake a follow-up survey to gain a better understanding of the drivers of satisfaction for this measure.
- **
- There were IT issues during the activation of the National Crisis Management Centre on 6 February 2013 and remote systems monitoring was unavailable. A unique Service Level Agreement with service providers is in development and IT issues encountered during this event have been remedied.
Output Appropriation: Emergency Sector Support and Development
Through this appropriation we develop and implement operational policies and projects, advice, assistance and information for the civil defence and emergency management sector. We develop and deliver long-term national programmes to raise individual and community awareness and preparedness.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[58] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 3,827 | 3,877 | 3,877 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | 121 | 136 | |
Total Revenue | 3,827 | 3,998 | 4,013 | |
Expenses | 3,827 | 3,998 | 3,721 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 292 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $171,000 was due to the provision of services to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade for disaster risk management support for the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, disaster risk management support for Pacific Island Countries (increase of $121,000), and an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $50,000).
Actual expenditure was seven per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower than anticipated personnel costs resulting from delays in filling vacancies and delays in the Emergency Management Information System project.
Output: Emergency Sector Support and Development
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Director Guidelines, Technical Standards, Codes and other civil defence and emergency management sector information publications maintained – currently reviewed at least every 4 years | 4–7 (of 25) | 5 | 4 |
Satisfaction, assessed as ‘Good’ or ‘Very Good’, in relation to: | |||
CDEM Group – coverage of the Guidelines, Technical Standards and Codes and other publications |
At least 80% | 69.2% | 64%* |
CDEM Group – quality of the Guidelines, Technical Standards, Codes and other publications |
At least 80% | 65.3% | 73%* |
the quality of the newsletters/updates – 16–20 issues |
At least 80% (of 200) | 82.2% | 67%* |
Attendee satisfaction with civil defence and emergency management training courses – assessed as ‘Good’ or ‘Very Good’ | At least 90% (of 120–150) | 97% | 93% (of 140) |
- *
- Although the Department has not met satisfaction targets for MCDEM stakeholders, only 5% of satisfaction survey respondents expressed dissatisfaction. In revising guidelines in 2013/14, MCDEM will involve CDEM groups closely and revamp the format of the E-Bulletin to help improve engagement and increase stakeholder satisfaction levels. The Department will conduct a follow-up survey with stakeholders and CDEM Groups to clarify any further opportunities for improving satisfaction levels.
Multi-class Output Appropriation: Information and Technology Services
Output Appropriation: Cross-Government ICT Investment Proposals
Under this appropriation we develop integrated service delivery programmes, investment proposals relating to potential cross-government common services, common ICT capability initiatives, and detailed business cases for selected initiatives to inform investment decisions by Ministers.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[60] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | – | 7,224 | 7,224 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | – | 7,224 | 7,224 | |
Expenses | – | 7,224 | 6,639 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 585 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $7.224 million was due to a realignment of expenditure to implement the functional leadership of Government ICT (increase of $3.000 million), a transfer of funding from 2011/12 to 2012/13 to part-fund all-of-government ICT initiatives (increase of $2.504 million), a transfer of funding from the Ministry of Social Development for the ServiceLink Service Transformation Programme (increase of $1.400 million), and funding for Optimise HR (increase of $750,000). The increases were partially offset by a realignment of expenditure for the Government Information Services Online Programme (decrease of $430,000).
Actual expenditure was eight per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to delays in implementation of the functional leadership of Government ICT initiatives and Servicelink ‘Service’ Transformation programme. In-principle expense transfers up to a maximum of $0.880 million to 2013/14 were approved.
Output: Cross-Government Service Delivery and ICT Investment Proposals
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Multi-agency business cases and funding proposals presented to Ministers for investment decisions | 10 | 6 | 0* |
ICT Ministers’ Group, Strategy Group and Council satisfaction with the quality of advice and support received[61] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Satisfied | Not measured** |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Advice and support services provided to the following groups, with regular meetings organised:
|
Combined: 25–30 | 36 | 18** |
- *
- Not achieved as it was initially unclear whether the Better Public Services seed fund might apply to business case funding, which it did not. However the Cloud business case was presented to Ministers in August 2012.
- **
- The ICT Ministers Group, ICT Strategy Group and ICT Council did not hold regular meetings throughout the entire 2012/13 financial year, and the Council went into abeyance in November 2012. Satisfaction surveys of the three groups were therefore not undertaken. The Department provided all advisory and support services required by the Groups during 2012/13.
Output: Service Transformation Planning and Implementation
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Develop and implement a plan to achieve specific targets that allow New Zealanders to complete their transaction with government easily in a digital environment | Achieved | New measure | Achieved* |
- *
- In August 2012 Cabinet approved the Result 10 Action Plan, which was developed by the Department. Implementation of the Result 10 Action Plan began in 2012/13 and will be completed by 2017.
Output Appropriation: Government Information and Technology Services
Under this appropriation we contribute to the development, deployment and operation of technology services across the State sector.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[62] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 5,723 | 7,677 | 7,677 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 2,016 | 3,390 | 3,415 | |
Total Revenue | 7,739 | 11,067 | 11,092 | |
Expenses | 7,712 | 15,893 | 13,768 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | 27 | (4,826) | (2,676) |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $8.181 million was due to managing the all-of-government adoption of Cloud computing (increase of $7.214 million); implementing the functional leadership of Government ICT (increase of $3.000 million); demand for information technology services by other agencies (increase of $1.700 million); expense transfers from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for Infrastructure as a Service transition (increase of $100,000), the Government Information Services Online programme (increase of $550,000) and an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $301,000); funding for Infrastructure as a Service as a result of the permanent capital to operating swap in 2012/13 (increase of $900,000); and a realignment of expenditure for the Government Information Services Online programme (increase of $430,000).
The increases were partially offset by a realignment of expenditure to implement the functional leadership of Government ICT (decrease of $3.000 million), a reduction in expenditure associated with managing the all-of-government adoption of Cloud computing (decrease of $2.714 million), and a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (decrease of $300,000).
Actual expenditure was 13 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to delays in the Infrastructure as a Service Transition project and Government Information Service Online Programme for which in-principle expense transfers up to a maximum of $1.400 million to 2013/14 were approved. Delays in delivery of all-of-government adoption of Cloud computing also contributed to the underspend.
Output: Government Technology Services
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) – new agencies signing the participating agency agreement | 7 | New measure | 31 |
Output: Government Information Services
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Availability of cross-government online services, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week | 99% | 99.8% | 99.87% |
Customer satisfaction with newzealand.govt.nz assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | 60% of respondents | New measure | Not yet measured* |
Delivery of online channel workshops to government agencies | 25 | New measure | 25 |
- *
- newzealand.govt is currently being redeveloped and customer satisfaction information will be collected once this is completed.
Output Appropriation: Local Government Services
Under this appropriation we provide information to and about local government, administer the Local Government Act 2002 and other statutes, and provide operational advice and support to the Minister of Local Government. We administer the Local Electoral Act 2001 and provide advisory and support services to the Local Government Commission for its statutory functions. We administer the Rates Rebate Scheme, provide regulatory and boating services for Lake Taupo (including providing the Harbourmaster and managing the Lake Taupo Landing Reserve) and provide governance and management of the National Dog Control Information Database.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[63] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 2,036 | 2,036 | 2,036 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 651 | 902 | 786 | |
Total Revenue | 2,687 | 2,938 | 2,822 | |
Expenses | 2,785 | 2,785 | 2,781 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | (98) | 153 | 41 |
Output: Local Government Services
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Responses to requests for information about the Rates Rebate Scheme within 10 days of receipt | At least 98% (of 300–600) | 99% (of 677) | 99% (of 444) |
Eligible claims for rates rebates processed within 20 days of receipt | At least 98% (of 105,000–120,000) | 54.8% (116,377) | 66% (109,650)* |
Availability of the dog registration database 24 hours a day, 7 days a week | At least 99% | 100% | 100% |
- *
- The performance standard for processing rates rebates claims is based on historical application numbers and processing expectations. The Department has improved its reporting mechanisms for processing these claims to more accurately understand processing times. The performance standard for this measure has been revised for 2013/14 to reflect achievable processing times. This measure refers to reimbursements to councils – processing times do not affect payments to ratepayers. No complaints have been received from councils during the year.
Output: Regulatory and Boating Services for Lake Taupo
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Boating facilities and navigational safety equipment inspected in accordance with an annual compliance programme | All | Achieved | All |
Lake Taupo Asset Management Plan actions for current year implemented | All | Achieved | All |
Stakeholders’ satisfaction with the quality of Lake Taupo navigational safety services[64] | Assessed by at least 85% as ‘3’ or above | 95% | 100% |
Multi-class Output Appropriation: Ministerial Support Services
Output Appropriation: Crown Entity Monitoring
Under this output appropriation we provide support, information and advice to Ministers to enable them to discharge their responsibilities (other than policy decision-making) for the Crown entities for which they are responsible.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[65] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 536 | 847 | 847 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 536 | 847 | 847 | |
Expenses | 536 | 847 | 675 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 172 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $311,000 was due to a reallocation of shared services costs.
Actual expenditure was 20 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower than anticipated expenditure on Greyhound Racing New Zealand litigation.
Output: Crown Entity Monitoring
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Advice on accountability documents delivered within statutory or agreed timeframes (based on delivery of documents to the Minister by the Crown entity) | 100% | Achieved (5) | 100% (11 documents) |
Appointment processes for board vacancies managed consistent with the approach agreed with the Minister (including amendments agreed with the Minister) | All | All (of 9) | All (of 8) |
Minister’s satisfaction with the quality of monitoring service provided66 | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Very Good | Standard met Q1: Very Good Q2: Very Good Q3: Very Good Q4: Good/Very Good |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Crown entities monitored
|
– | – | – |
Output Appropriation: Ministerial Support Services – Community and Voluntary Sector
Under this output appropriation we provide services to Ministers to enable them to discharge their portfolio (other than policy decision-making) responsibilities relating to the community and voluntary sector.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[67] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 150 | 150 | 151 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 150 | 150 | 151 | |
Expenses | 150 | 150 | 174 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | (23) |
Actual expenditure was 16 per cent higher than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to higher than anticipated costs of personnel due to vacant positions being covered by contractors.
Output: Ministerial Correspondence and Questions
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Acceptance of first draft responses presented to the Minister | At least 95% | 100% | 98.1% |
Required timeframes are met | At least 95% | 100% | 98.9% |
Information briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | Achieved | Achieved |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Information briefings and responses required to ministerial correspondence, information requests and parliamentary questions | 760–935* | 88 | 91 |
- *
- The ISE standard was based on an anticipated increase in the volume of ministerial correspondence due to the transition of the functions of the Charities Commission on 1 July 2012. This increase has not materialised. The standard was revised downwards to 85–140.
Output Appropriation: Ministerial Support Services – Emergency Management
Under this appropriation we provide services to Ministers to enable them to discharge their portfolio (other than policy decision-making) responsibilities relating to civil defence and emergency management.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[68] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 34 | 189 | 189 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 34 | 189 | 189 | |
Expenses | 34 | 189 | 254 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | (65) |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $155,000 was due to a reallocation of shared services costs.
Actual expenditure was 34 per cent higher than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to higher than anticipated costs of the Get Ready, Get Thru campaign.
Output: Ministerial Correspondence and Questions
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Acceptance of first draft responses presented to the Minister | At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
Required timeframes are met | At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
Information briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | Achieved | Achieved |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Information briefings and responses required to ministerial correspondence, information requests and parliamentary questions | 145–195* | 49 | 161 |
- *
- The Department anticipated an increase in the ministerial correspondence in line with recent trends. This increase did not materialise in 2012/13 and the standard was revised to 85–135.
Output Appropriation: Ministerial Support Services – Ethnic Affairs
Under this output appropriation we provide services to Ministers to enable them to discharge their portfolio (other than policy decision-making) responsibilities relating to ethnic affairs.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[69] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 89 | 89 | 89 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 89 | 89 | 89 | |
Expenses | 89 | 89 | 97 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | (8) |
Actual expenditure was nine per cent higher than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to higher than planned personnel-related expenditure.
Output: Ministerial Correspondence and Questions
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Acceptance of first draft responses presented to the Minister | At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
Required timeframes are met | At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
Information briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | Achieved | Achieved |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Information briefings and responses required to ministerial correspondence, information requests and parliamentary questions | 70–120 | 223 | 128 |
Output Appropriation: Ministerial Support Services – Internal Affairs
Under this appropriation we provide services to Ministers to enable them to discharge their portfolio (other than policy decision-making) responsibilities relating to internal affairs, including regulatory and identity matters, all-of government information and communications technology, the role of information in New Zealand’s cultural and economic life, public recordkeeping and the management of national archives, and other areas that fall within the Internal Affairs portfolio.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[70] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 380 | 380 | 379 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 380 | 380 | 379 | |
Expenses | 380 | 380 | 326 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 53 |
Actual expenditure was 14 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower than anticipated personnel costs resulting from delays in filling vacancies.
Output: Ministerial Correspondence and Questions
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Acceptance of first draft responses presented to the Minister | At least 95% | 99.9% | 98.3% |
Required timeframes are met | At least 95% | 99.3% | 98.7% |
Information briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | Achieved | Achieved |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Information briefings and responses required to ministerial correspondence, information requests and parliamentary questions | 820–1,060* | 690 | 447 |
- *
- The Department anticipated an increase in the ministerial correspondence in line with recent trends. This increase did not materialise in 2012/13 and the standard was revised to 410–535.
Output Appropriation: Ministerial Support Services – Local Government
Under this output appropriation we provide services to Ministers to enable them to discharge their portfolio (other than policy decision-making) responsibilities relating to local government.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[71] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 450 | 295 | 295 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 450 | 295 | 295 | |
Expenses | 450 | 295 | 352 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | (57) |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $155,000 was due to a reallocation of shared services costs.
Actual expenditure was 19 per cent higher than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to vacant positions being covered by contractors.
Output: Ministerial Correspondence and Questions
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Acceptance of first draft responses presented to the Minister | At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
Required timeframes are met | At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
Information briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | Achieved | Achieved |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Information briefings and responses required to ministerial correspondence, information requests and parliamentary questions | 820–1,150* | 793 | 681 |
- *
- The Department anticipated an increase in the ministerial correspondence in line with recent trends. This increase did not materialise in 2012/13, and the standard has been revised.
Output Appropriation: Ministerial Support Services – Ministerial Services
Under this output appropriation we provide services to Ministers to enable them to discharge their portfolio (other than policy decision-making) responsibilities relating to ministerial services.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[72] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 200 | 200 | 200 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 200 | 200 | 200 | |
Expenses | 200 | 200 | 175 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 25 |
Actual expenditure was 13 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower than anticipated personnel costs resulting from delays in filling vacancies.
Output: Ministerial Correspondence and Questions
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Acceptance of first draft responses presented to the Minister | At least 95% | New measure | 100% |
Required timeframes are met | At least 95% | New measure | 99% |
Information briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards- demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | New measure | Achieved |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Information briefings and responses required to ministerial correspondence, information requests and parliamentary questions | 140–200 | New measure | 169 |
Output Appropriation: Ministerial Support Services – Racing
Under this output appropriation we provide services to Ministers to enable them to discharge their portfolio (other than policy decision-making) responsibilities relating to racing.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[73] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 15 | 47 | 47 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 15 | 47 | 47 | |
Expenses | 15 | 47 | 51 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | (4) |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $32,000 was due to a reallocation of shared services costs.
Actual expenditure was nine per cent higher than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to vacant positions being covered by contractors.
Output: Ministerial Correspondence and Questions
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Acceptance of first draft responses presented to the Minister | At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
Required timeframes are met | At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
Information briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | Achieved | Achieved |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Information briefings and responses required to ministerial correspondence, information requests and parliamentary questions | As required | 45 | 101 |
Multi-class Output Appropriation: Policy Advice
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice – Community and Voluntary Sector
Under this appropriation we provide advice (including second opinion advice and contributions to policy advice led by other agencies) to support decision-making by Ministers on government policy matters relating to the community and voluntary sector.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[74] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 1,756 | 1,747 | 1,747 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 3 | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 1,759 | 1,747 | 1,747 | |
Expenses | 1,759 | 1,747 | 1,041 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 706 |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $12,000 was due to a reallocation of shared services costs (decrease of $32,000), a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (decrease of $3,000). This was partially offset by an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $23,000).
Actual expenditure was 40 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower than anticipated personnel costs resulting from delays in filling vacancies.
Output: Policy Advice
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Policy work programme to support the Output Plan delivered with: | |||
agreed timeframes met |
At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
any extensions agreed before required dates |
At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
Policy advice and policy briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | New measure | Achieved |
Minister’s satisfaction with the quality of policy advice (quarterly)[75] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Q1: Satisfied Q2: N/A Q3: Good Q4: Satisfied |
Q1: Satisfied Q2: Good Q3: Good Q4: Good |
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice – Emergency Management
Under this appropriation we provide advice (including second opinion advice and contributions to policy advice led by other agencies) to support decision-making by Ministers on government policy matters relating to civil defence and emergency management.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[76] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 776 | 715 | 715 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 776 | 715 | 715 | |
Expenses | 776 | 715 | 582 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 133 |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $61,000 was due to a reallocation of shared services costs (decrease of $69,000), and was partially offset by an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $8,000).
Actual expenditure was 19 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower than anticipated personnel costs resulting from delays in filling vacancies.
Output: Policy Advice
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Policy work programme to support the Output Plan delivered with: | |||
agreed timeframes met |
At least 95% | 100% | 98.43% |
any extensions agreed before required dates |
At least 95% | 100% | 98.43% |
Policy advice and policy briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | New measure | Achieved |
Minister’s satisfaction with the quality of policy advice (quarterly)[77] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Q1: N/A Q2: N/A Q3: Good Q4: Very Good |
Q1: Good Q2: Good Q3: Satisfied Q4: Satisfied |
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice – Ethnic Affairs
Under this appropriation we provide advice (including second opinion advice and contributions to policy advice led by other agencies) to support decision-making by Ministers on government policy matters relating to ethnic affairs.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[78] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 693 | 752 | 752 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 107 | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 800 | 752 | 752 | |
Expenses | 800 | 752 | 722 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 30 |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $48,000 was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (decrease of $107,000). This was partially offset by a reallocation of shared services costs (increase of $50,000), and an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $9,000).
Output: Policy Advice
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Policy work programme to support the Output Plan delivered with: | |||
agreed timeframes met |
At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
any extensions agreed before required dates |
At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
Policy advice and policy briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | New measure | Achieved |
Minister’s satisfaction with the quality of policy advice (quarterly)[79] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Q1: Good Q2: N/A Q3: Satisfied Q4: Satisfied |
Q1: Very Good Q2: Very Good Q3: Good Q4: Very Good |
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice – Internal Affairs
Under this appropriation we provide advice (including second opinion advice and contributions to policy advice led by other agencies) to support decision-making by Ministers on government policy matters relating to internal affairs, including regulatory and identity matters, all-of-government information and communications technology, the role of information in New Zealand’s cultural and economic life, public recordkeeping and the management of national archives, and other areas that fall within the Internal Affairs portfolio.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[80] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 4,138 | 3,746 | 3,746 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 112 | 112 | 2 | |
Total Revenue | 4,250 | 3,858 | 3,748 | |
Expenses | 4,250 | 3,858 | 4,046 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | (298) |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $392,000 was due to a reallocation of shared services costs (decrease of $322,000), a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (decrease of $75,000). This was partially offset by an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $5,000).
Actual expenditure was five per cent higher than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to higher than anticipated costs of personnel due to vacant positions being covered by contractors.
Output: Policy Advice
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Policy work programme to support the Output Plan delivered with: | |||
agreed timeframes met |
At least 95% | 100% | 98.59% |
any extensions agreed before required dates |
At least 95% | 100% | 98.59% |
Policy advice and policy briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | New measure | Achieved |
Minister’s satisfaction with the quality of policy advice (quarterly)[81] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Q1: Good Q2: N/A Q3: N/A Q4: Very Good |
Q1: Very Good Q2: Very Good Q3: Very Good Q4: Good to Very Good |
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice – Local Government
Under this appropriation we provide advice (including second opinion advice and contributions to policy advice led by other agencies) to support decision-making by Ministers on government policy matters relating to local government.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[82] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 5,814 | 5,011 | 5,011 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 5,814 | 5,011 | 5,011 | |
Expenses | 5,814 | 5,011 | 5,284 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | (273) |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $803,000 was due to a transfer of funding to the Support for Statutory and Other Bodies MCOA for the expanded role of the Local Government Commission (decrease of $824,000). This was partially offset by an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $21,000).
Actual expenditure was five per cent higher than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to higher than anticipated cost of a feasibility study of Pitt Island Wharf.
Output: Policy Advice
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Policy work programme to support the Output Plan delivered with: | |||
agreed timeframes met |
At least 95% | 100% | 99.11% |
any extensions agreed before required dates |
At least 95% | 100% | 99.11% |
Policy advice and policy briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | New measure | Achieved |
Minister’s satisfaction with the quality of policy advice (quarterly)[83] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Q1: N/A Q2: N/A Q3: N/A Q4: Very Good |
Q1: Very Good Q2: N/A* Q3: Very Good Q4: Very Good |
- *
- No survey was undertaken in the second quarter due to a change in Minister.
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice – Racing
Under this appropriation we provide advice (including second opinion advice and contributions to policy advice led by other agencies) to support decision-making by Ministers on government policy matters relating to racing.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[84] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 198 | 198 | 198 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 1 | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 199 | 198 | 198 | |
Expenses | 199 | 198 | 175 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 23 |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $1,000 was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (decrease of $1,000).
Actual expenditure was 12 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower than anticipated personnel costs resulting from delays in filling vacancies.
Output: Policy Advice
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Policy work programme to support the Output Plan delivered with: | |||
agreed timeframes met |
At least 95% | 100% | 100% |
any extensions agreed before required dates |
At least 95 % | 100% | 99.11% |
Policy advice and policy briefings delivered to agreed quality criteria and standards – demonstrated through independent assessment | Agreed quality criteria and standards met | New measure | Achieved |
Minister’s satisfaction with the quality of policy advice (quarterly)[85] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Q1: N/A Q2: N/A Q3: Good Q4: N/A |
Q1: Good to Very Good Q2: Good to Very Good Q3: Good Q4: Good |
Multi-class Output Appropriation: Regulatory Services
Output Appropriation: Charities Administration
Under this appropriation we deliver services to register charities and contribute to promoting public trust and confidence in the charitable sector.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[86] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | – | 5,164 | 5,164 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | 852 | 769 | |
Total Revenue | – | 6,016 | 5,933 | |
Expenses | – | 6,016 | 5,902 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 31 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $6.016 million was due to the transfer of Charities Commission functions to an operational unit within the Department from 1 July 2012 (increase of $5.918 million) and the capital charge on the net assets transferred from the Charities Commission to the Department from 1 July 2012 (increase of $98,000).
Output: Charities Administration
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Properly completed applications for registration decided within 30 days of receipt | At least 70% | 10.3% | 14.91%* |
Properly completed annual returns published within 10 days of receipt | At least 95% | 98.1% | 99.06% |
Register online availability per month | At least 97% | 97.7% | 98.10% |
Registered charities that are investigated (in accordance with the standards and guidelines approved by the Board) to ensure the organisation continues to meet the requirements for registration as a charitable entity | 300 | 360 | 311 |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Annual returns received | 25,000 | 22,914 | 30,357 |
- *
- The Department inherited a backlog of registration applications following the transfer of the Charities Commission functions on 1 July 2012. As a result, the performance standard for this measure has not been achieved. This backlog has now been cleared. We are continuing to track this measure closely and are now meeting the performance standard each month.
Output Appropriation: Regulatory Services
Under this appropriation we provide operational policy advice and services to administer all aspects of the regulatory regime under the Public Records Act 2005, including where the Chief Archivist has statutory independence. We provide services to regulate gambling activity, objectionable material and unsolicited electronic messages, anti-money laundering and countering financing of terrorism, and the private security sector.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[87] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 9,414 | 11,121 | 11,119 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 22,130 | 22,183 | 21,641 | |
Total Revenue | 31,544 | 33,304 | 32,760 | |
Expenses | 30,354 | 32,493 | 30,732 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | 1,190 | 811 | 2,028 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $2.139 million was due to expenditure associated with gaming activities (increase of $1.089 million), a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (increase of $1.024 million), the recovery of business continuity expenditure relating to the Canterbury earthquakes (increase of $18,000), and an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $8,000).
Actual expenditure was five per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates, primarily due to lower than anticipated costs for anti-money laundering and gaming regulatory activities. An in-principle expense transfer up to a maximum of $0.500 million to 2013/14 was approved for anti-money laundering.
Output: Gambling
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Venue inspections conducted[88] | Up to 200 | 651 | 225 |
Interim audit report to non-club gaming machine societies completed within 6 months | 4–10 | Revised measure | 7* (of 9) |
Gambling sector organisation and operator satisfaction with information services – assessed as ‘3’ or better | At least 85% | 91% | 99% |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Applications for gambling licences processed: | |||
club and non-club licence renewals |
300–350 | 306 | 318 |
other Class 3 and 4 licence applications and Certificates of Approval |
4,200–4,600 | 5,941 | 4,148** |
- *
- The standard is based on the number of interim audit reports issued within a six month timeframe within each each financial year, regardless of when the audit began. For 2012/13, nine interim reports were issued. Of this number, seven were issued within six months and two were issued outside the standard timeframe.
- **
- Fewer than anticipated applications for gambling licences were processed during 2012/13 due to implementation of the new Integrated Gambling Platform electronic licensing system. The performance measure has been revised for 2013/14.
Output: Censorship
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Number of intelligence reports in relation to suspects and possible victims: | |||
received (from national and international enforcement agencies) |
50–300 | New measure | 453 |
forwarded (from national and international enforcement agencies) |
5–50 | New measure | 61 |
Number of websites being filtered | 3,600–6,000* | New measure | 578 |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Number of justified appeals from websites being filtered | 50–200* | New measure | 0 |
- *
- The performance standards for the number of websites filtered and the expected number of justified appeals from websites being filtered were incorrectly recorded in the 2012/13 Information Supporting the Estimates of Appropriations for Vote Internal Affairs. The performance standards for these measures are considered to have been achieved.
Output: Unsolicited Electronic Messages
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Spam complaints determined to be of a high priority are acted on | 500–1,000 | New measure | 603 |
Civil liability proceedings undertaken – covering warning letters, infringement notices and statements of claim issued | 30–90 | 99 | 31 |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Monitoring and tracking campaigns reported nationally and internationally | 300–800 | New measure | 246* |
- *
- The performance standard for this measure has not been met due to lower demand i.e. fewer spam campaigns being carried out or reported by business and the public. If more than one complaint is received about the same message this only counts as one campaign.
Output: Public Sector Recordkeeping
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Public offices independently audited against recordkeeping standards (Public Records Act 2005) | 40 (of 200) | 21.5% (43 offices audited) | 47 |
Appraisal reports submitted to and received by the Chief Archivist processed within 10 weeks | At least 80% (of 50–70) | 86.5% (of 37) | 100% |
Recordkeeping advice requests responded to within 5 working days of receipt | At least 75% (of 800–1,000) | 87.2% (of 337) | 89.35% (of 235)* |
Attendee satisfaction with training courses – assessed as ‘Good’ or ‘Very Good’[89] | At least 80% (of 250–300) | 96.8% (of 166) | 92.30% (of 177)** |
- *
- The number of recordkeeping advice requests has reduced considerably due to an increase in the amount of information and guidance proactively provided to public offices through the Archives New Zealand website and other communication mechanisms.
- **
- There has been a reduction in the number of attendees at recordkeeping training courses. The number of attendees is very dependent on demand from public offices.
Output: Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism work programme actions for current year implemented including:
|
By June 2013 | Achieved | Achieved |
Output: Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Investigation resolved within timeframes specified in Service Level Indicators | 95% | New measure | 77%* |
- *
- The performance standard for resolving investigations within agreed timelines was based on estimates for the first year of operation of this function. In practice, investigations were more complicated and time consuming than expected. The Department and the Ministry of Justice have focused on the quality of the investigations, rather than the timeframes. Performance measures for this function have been revised accordingly for 2013/14.
Multi-class Output Appropriation: Services Supporting the Executive
Output Appropriation: Coordination of Official Visits and Events
Under this appropriation we manage programmes for visiting Guests of Government, State and ministerial functions. We coordinate a range of services in support of ceremonial and commemorative events and facilitate the passage of New Zealand and foreign dignitaries and others authorised by the Crown into and out of New Zealand.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[90] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 4,212 | 5,262 | 5,263 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 5 | 5 | – | |
Total Revenue | 4,217 | 5,267 | 5,263 | |
Expenses | 4,217 | 5,267 | 4,600 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 663 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $1.050 million was due to funding for the visit by the Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall in November 2012 as part of the Diamond Jubilee Celebrations (increase of $1.100 million). This was partially offset by an expense transfer from 2012/13 to 2013/14 due to a delay in the timing of the visit by the Earl and Countess of Wessex (decrease of $50,000).
Actual expenditure was 13 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower than anticipated costs associated with the royal visits.
Output: Official Visits and Events Coordination
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Percentage of visits where the Sponsoring Ministers rate as satisfactory the arrangements for: | |||
design and implementation of programmes for Guests of Government[91] |
90% | Revised measure | 100% |
design and implementation of State and ministerial functions |
90% | Revised measure | 100% |
coordination and management of official events |
90% | Revised measure | 100% |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Official visits – Heads of State and full Guests of Government | 25–30 visits (average 1–2 days) | 71 | 49 |
State and ministerial functions | 4–8 | 5 | 3* |
Commemorative and special events | 10–15 | 14 | 15 |
Facilitations of parties through international airports (with an average of 1–4 people in each party) | 500–600 facilitations | 745 | 715 |
- *
- The Department’s Visits and Ceremonial Office has coordinated all State and ministerial functions requested in 2012/13.
Output Appropriation: Support Services to Members of the Executive
Under this appropriation we provide support services for Members of the Executive, including in their capacity as a Member of Parliament, primarily through office personnel and administrative services, information and communications technology, and the provision and management of residential accommodation.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[92] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 24,785 | 24,906 | 24,905 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 35 | 35 | 2 | |
Total Revenue | 24,820 | 24,941 | 24,907 | |
Expenses | 24,820 | 24,941 | 24,565 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 342 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $121,000 was due to an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012.
Output: Support Services to Members of the Executive
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Completion by ministerial office staff of ‘core role’ induction training within 2 months in their positions | At least 90% | 100% | 100% |
Availability of information and communications technology systems, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week | No less than 99.5% | 99.85% | 99.73% |
Minister Responsible for Ministerial Services’ satisfaction with the quality and level of support services provided to the Members of the Executive[93] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Good/Very Good | Very Good |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Average number of ministerial office personnel provided | 150–170 | 154 | 152 |
Ministerial and other payments administered (Other Expense Appropriations (Non-departmental)): | |||
Executive Council and Members of the Executive – Salaries and Allowances (PLA) |
26–30 people | 28 | 28 |
Former Governors-General – Annuities and Other Payments (PLA) |
4–8 people | 7 | 6 |
Former Prime Ministers – Annuities (PLA) |
3–7 people | 5 | 5 |
Former Prime Ministers – Domestic Travel |
Multiple journeys for 12–15 people | Revised measure | 12 |
Members of the Executive – Travel |
Multiple journeys for 200–240 people | Revised measure | 272 |
Output Appropriation: VIP Transport Services
Under this appropriation we provide chauffeur-driven and self-drive vehicle services for parties specified in legislation, as authorised by members of the Executive, or who otherwise meet qualifying criteria.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[94] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | – | – | – | |
Revenue Third Parties | 7,814 | 7,814 | 7,053 | |
Total Revenue | 7,814 | 7,814 | 7,053 | |
Expenses | 8,273 | 7,814 | 7,684 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | (459) | – | (631) |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $459,000 was due to a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings.
Output: VIP Transport Services
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Fuel efficiency for chauffeur-driven vehicles (annual average) | No more than 10 litres per 100km | 9.07 litres per 100km | 8.62 litres per 100km |
Chauffeur-driven services provided leading to no sustained complaints | At least 99.5% (of 22,000–24,000 jobs) | Revised measure | 99.8% (15 errors out of 12,083 jobs)* |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Total vehicle fleet | 72–77 | 75 | 71** |
- *
- The number of jobs is entirely determined by the demand from users and the Department has experienced lower demand compared with previous years.
- **
- This is a measure of demand and is partly determined by the number of Ministers taking up their entitlement to a self-drive.
Multi-class Output Appropriation: Support for Statutory and Other Bodies
Output Appropriation: Commissions of Inquiry and Similar Bodies
Under this appropriation we provide support to commissions of inquiry and similar bodies.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[95] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 4,698 | 5,520 | 5,520 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 1,089 | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 5,787 | 5,520 | 5,520 | |
Expenses | 5,787 | 5,520 | 5,086 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 434 |
The decrease in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $267,000 was due to a transfer of funding from 2012/13 to 2013/14 to other Vote Internal Affairs appropriations as a result of efficiency gains in 2012/13 (decrease of $1.500 million), a correction of the transition to the single Vote in 2012/13 and the application of efficiency savings (decrease of $832,000). This was partially offset by expense transfers from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Building Failure caused by Canterbury Earthquakes (increase of $1.315 million), and the Royal Commission of Inquiry on the Pike River Coal Mine Tragedy (increase of $750,000).
Actual expenditure was eight per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower than anticipated costs associated with the Royal Commissions of Inquiry.
Output: Commissions of Inquiry and Similar Bodies
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Commissions’ satisfaction with the timeliness and quality of services received[96] | Assessed as ‘Good’ or better | Satisfied | Good |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Support services provided to the following commissions of inquiry and similar bodies:
|
– | – | – |
Output Appropriation: Statutory and Advisory Body Support – National Archives
Under this appropriation we provide advisory and support services to statutory and advisory bodies with relation to Archives New Zealand to enable them to discharge their responsibilities.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[97] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 101 | 101 | 101 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 101 | 101 | 101 | |
Expenses | 101 | 101 | 70 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 31 |
Actual expenditure was 31 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower than anticipated personnel costs resulting from delays in filling vacancies.
Output: Statutory and Advisory Body Support
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Statutory body member satisfaction with the quality of support received[98] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Satisfied | Satisfied |
Support services provided to the following statutory bodies advising the Minister – meetings supported
|
4 | New measure | 4 |
Output Appropriation: Statutory and Advisory Body Support – National Library
Under this appropriation we provide services and advice to statutory and advisory bodies with relation to the National Library of New Zealand to enable them to discharge their responsibilities.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[99] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 93 | 93 | 93 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 7 | 7 | – | |
Total Revenue | 100 | 100 | 93 | |
Expenses | 100 | 100 | 3 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 90 |
Output: Statutory and Advisory Body Support
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Statutory body member satisfaction with the quality of support received[100] | Assessed as ‘Satisfied’ or better | Satisfied | Good |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Support services provided to the following statutory bodies – meetings supported: | |||
Guardians Kaitiaki of the Alexander Turnbull Library |
4 | – | 5 |
Library and Information Advisory Committee |
4 | – | 5 |
Public Lending Right Advisory Group |
1 | – | 1 |
Output Appropriation: Statutory Body Support – Gambling Commission
Under this appropriation we provide services and advice to the Gambling Commission to enable the Commission to discharge its responsibilities.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[101] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 675 | – | – | |
Revenue Third Parties | 509 | 1,158 | 894 | |
Total Revenue | 1,184 | 1,158 | 894 | |
Expenses | 1,158 | 1,158 | 894 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | 26 | – | – |
Actual expenditure was 23 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to a lower than anticipated number of appeals to Gambling Commission resulting in lower legal costs.
Output: Statutory Body Support
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Gambling Commission’s satisfaction with the support services provided[102] | Assessed as ‘4’ or better | 4.8 | 4.6 |
Output Appropriation: Statutory Body Support – Local Government Commission
Under this appropriation we provide advisory and support services to the Local Government Commission in respect of its statutory functions.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[103] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 780 | 1,604 | 1,604 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 780 | 1,604 | 1,604 | |
Expenses | 780 | 1,604 | 1,190 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 414 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $824,000 was due to a transfer of funding from the Policy Advice MCOA for the expanded role of the Local Government Commission.
Actual expenditure was 26 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to delays in projects relating to the enactment of the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Act 2012. An in-principle expense transfer up to a maximum of $0.400 million to 2013/14 was approved.
Output: Statutory Body Support
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Local Government Commission decisions dispatched to parties within 10 days, or other agreed timing | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Local Government Commission’s satisfaction with the quality of advice and support services received[104] | Assessed as ‘3’ or above | 5 | 4 |
Output Appropriation: Support for Grant Funding Bodies – Community and Voluntary Sector
Under this appropriation we provide operational and secretariat support for grant funding bodies, including supporting member appointment processes. The focus of operational support is on processing grant applications and grant decisions on behalf of grant funding bodies.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[105] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 300 | 324 | 324 | |
Revenue Third Parties | – | – | – | |
Total Revenue | 300 | 324 | 324 | |
Expenses | 300 | 324 | 322 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 2 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $24,000 was due to an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012.
Output: Support Services for Grant Funding Bodies
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Online information on grant funding opportunities and applications processes current:
|
At least once annually | Achieved | Achieved |
Grant applications presented for decision within agreed timeframes | At least 95% (of 140–160) | 100% (of 144) | 100% (of 176) |
Committee/Trust member satisfaction with operational support received[106] | Assessed by at least 90% as ‘4 ’or better | 60% | 91.6%* |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Support services provided to the following grant funding bodies – committee meetings organised:
|
Combined: 12 | 10 | 11** |
- *
- Satisfaction of Committee and Trust members was combined into a single measure from 2011/12. The large increase in member satisfaction from 2011/12 and 2012/13 may be attributed partly to a calculation error in the 2011/12 Annual Report, which reported on Trust member satisfaction only (60%). Trust and Committee member satisfaction has improved in 2012/13 with Trust member satisfaction at 74% (17 out of 23 members) and Committee member satisfaction at 95% (124 of 131 members).
- **
- The Peace and Disarmament Education Trust and Vietnam Veterans and Their Families Trust reduced the number of meetings required during the year. While the number of meetings has decreased, this has not impacted the services provided to the Trusts and their members, or affected the number of applications considered.
Output Appropriation: Support for Grant Funding Bodies – Internal Affairs
Under this appropriation we provide operational and secretariat support for grant funding bodies, including supporting member appointment processes. The focus of operational support is on processing grant applications and grant decisions on behalf of the grant funding bodies.
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual[107] | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
Revenue Crown | 1,190 | 1,194 | 1,194 | |
Revenue Third Parties | 9,627 | 9,667 | 8,241 | |
Total Revenue | 10,817 | 10,861 | 9,435 | |
Expenses | 10,817 | 10,861 | 9,265 | |
Net Surplus/(Deficit) | – | – | 170 |
The increase in the budget between the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates of $44,000 was due to the provision of services to the Lottery Grants Board (increase of $40,000) and an expense transfer from 2011/12 to 2012/13 for an ongoing programme of initiatives to enable the Department to position for efficiency savings from 1 July 2012 (increase of $4,000).
Actual expenditure was 15 per cent lower than the Supplementary Estimates primarily due to lower provision of services to the Lottery Grants Board.
Output: Support Services for Grant Funding Bodies
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Online information on grant funding opportunities and applications processes current:
|
At least once annually | Achieved | Achieved |
Grant applications received, assessed and: | |||
presented for decision within agreed timeframes |
At least 95% (of 5,700–6,200) | 100% (of 4,365) | 100% (of 4,520) |
not presented for decision (ineligible or incomplete) |
0–1,000 | 837 | 686 |
Committee/Trust member satisfaction with operational support received[108] | Assessed by at least 90% as 4 or better | 88% | 95% |
Standard | 2011/12 | 2012/13 | |
---|---|---|---|
Support services provided to the following grant funding bodies – committee meetings organised:
|
Combined: 68–75 | 63 (excl CEAT) | 62* |
- *
- The Lottery Community Committees, as well as some specialist committees, have reduced the number of meetings they hold per year from three to two per committee per year. This reduction is due to policy changes to support the Lottery Grants Board’s positive cash-flow approach, and it takes into account the variable volumes of applications considered by the community committees at each meeting. While the number of meetings has decreased, this has not impacted on the services provided to committees or their members, and does not affect the number of applications to be considered.
Comparison of output and revenue expenses 2011/12 to 2012/13
On 1 July 2012 the Department of Internal Affairs implemented Cabinet’s decision to establish a single Vote Internal Affairs. This merged the eight Votes previously administered by the Department into one Vote. The establishment of the single Vote was fiscally neutral and the proportion of resources available in each portfolio remained unchanged. Portfolio Ministers within the single Vote retain responsibility for spending, priorities and work programmes within their portfolios.
All previous appropriations and outputs were integrated into the single Vote structure. However, the revised appropriation structure means a direct comparison of output funding and revenue expenses between the 2011/12 and 2012/13 financial years is not possible.
The table below provides a summary of output and revenue expenses at a Departmental level:
2011/12 | 2012/13 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Actual | Mains | Supps. | Actual | |
214,143 | Revenue Crown | 193,387 | 213,128 | 213,125 |
161,855 | Revenue Third Parties | 158,042 | 163,442 | 157,948 |
375,998 | Total Revenue | 351,429 | 376,570 | 371,073 |
353,952 | Expenses | 357,808 | 387,798 | 367,930 |
22,046 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | (6,379) | (11,228) | 3,143 |
The tables below summarise output and revenue expenses under the previous Vote structure, and indicate the new appropriations that they map to.
For further information on the relationship between the new and old Vote structures refer to the 2012 Budget publication: Māori, Other Populations and Cultural Sector – Information Supporting the Estimates of Appropriations 2012/13, available at www.treasury.govt.nz.
Vote Community and Voluntary Sector
2011/12 Appropriation and Funding | Appropriation funding transferred for 2012/13 to: | |
---|---|---|
Multi-Class Output Appropriation: Policy Advice, Advisory and Support Services | ||
Output Appropriation: Administration of Grants |
|
|
4,043 | Revenue Crown | |
43 | Revenue Third Parties | |
4,086 | Total Revenue | |
4,090 | Expenses | |
(4) | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Community Advisory Services |
|
|
5,886 | Revenue Crown | |
71 | Revenue Third Parties | |
5,957 | Total Revenue | |
5,581 | Expenses | |
376 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice |
|
|
1,878 | Revenue Crown | |
28 | Revenue Third Parties | |
1,906 | Total Revenue | |
1,647 | Expenses | |
259 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Support Services for Grant Funding Bodies |
|
|
314 | Revenue Crown | |
3 | Revenue Third Parties | |
317 | Total Revenue | |
250 | Expenses | |
67 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) |
Vote Emergency Management
2011/12 Appropriation and Funding | Appropriation funding transferred for 2012/13 to: | |
---|---|---|
Multi-Class Output Appropriation: Emergency Management Services | ||
Output Appropriation: Management of National Emergency Readiness, Response and Recovery |
|
|
5,285 | Revenue Crown | |
42 | Revenue Third Parties | |
5,327 | Total Revenue | |
4,843 | Expenses | |
484 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice – Emergency Management |
|
|
847 | Revenue Crown | |
21 | Revenue Third Parties | |
868 | Total Revenue | |
1,105 | Expenses | |
(237) | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Support Services, Information and Education |
|
|
6,700 | Revenue Crown | |
62 | Revenue Third Parties | |
6,762 | Total Revenue | |
6,171 | Expenses | |
591 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) |
Vote Internal Affairs
2011/12 Appropriation and Funding | Appropriation funding transferred for 2012/13 to: | |
---|---|---|
Output Appropriation: Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism |
|
|
1,131 | Revenue Crown | |
12 | Revenue Third Parties | |
1,143 | Total Revenue | |
1,035 | Expenses | |
108 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Contestable Services (RDA) |
|
|
See main table above | ||
Output Appropriation: Cross Government ICT Investment Proposals |
|
|
3,000 | Revenue Crown | |
– | Revenue Third Parties | |
3,000 | Total Revenue | |
2,926 | Expenses | |
74 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Government Technology Services |
|
|
7,380 | Revenue Crown | |
2,582 | Revenue Third Parties | |
9,962 | Total Revenue | |
9,919 | Expenses | |
43 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Identity Services |
|
|
20,659 | Revenue Crown | |
109,848 | Revenue Third Parties | |
130,507 | Total Revenue | |
116,320 | Expenses | |
14,187 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Machinery of Government Transition Costs |
|
|
– | Revenue Crown | |
– | Revenue Third Parties | |
– | Total Revenue | |
800 | Expenses | |
(800) | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Information and Advisory Services |
|
|
13,544 | Revenue Crown | |
1,499 | Revenue Third Parties | |
15,043 | Total Revenue | |
13,048 | Expenses | |
1,995 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice – Internal Affairs |
|
|
3,389 | Revenue Crown | |
55 | Revenue Third Parties | |
3,444 | Total Revenue | |
3,473 | Expenses | |
(29) | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Regulatory Services |
|
|
4,216 | Revenue Crown | |
20,664 | Revenue Third Parties | |
24,860 | Total Revenue | |
25,279 | Expenses | |
(419) | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Service Delivery Programme Development PLA |
||
– | Revenue Crown | |
288 | Revenue Third Parties | |
288 | Total Revenue | |
288 | Expenses | |
– | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Services for Ethnic Affairs |
|
|
4,613 | Revenue Crown | |
1,015 | Revenue Third Parties | |
5,628 | Total Revenue | |
5,497 | Expenses | |
131 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Support Services for Grant Funding Bodies |
|
|
1,232 | Revenue Crown | |
7,961 | Revenue Third Parties | |
9,193 | Total Revenue | |
8,994 | Expenses | |
199 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) |
Vote Local Government
2011/12 Appropriation and Funding | Appropriation funding transferred for 2012/13 to: | |
---|---|---|
Multi-Class Output Appropriation: Services for Local Government | ||
Output Appropriation: Information, Support and Regulatory Services – Local Government |
|
|
2,444 | Revenue Crown | |
648 | Revenue Third Parties | |
3,092 | Total Revenue | |
3,751 | Expenses | |
(659) | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice – Local Government |
|
|
4,325 | Revenue Crown | |
63 | Revenue Third Parties | |
4,388 | Total Revenue | |
3,729 | Expenses | |
659 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) |
Vote Ministerial Services
2011/12 Appropriation and Funding | Appropriation funding transferred for 2012/13 to: | |
---|---|---|
Multi-Class Output Appropriation: Emergency Management Services | ||
Output Appropriation: Official Visits and Events Coordination |
|
|
4,285 | Revenue Crown | |
36 | Revenue Third Parties | |
4,321 | Total Revenue | |
4,343 | Expenses | |
(22) | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Support Services to Members of the Executive |
|
|
26,473 | Revenue Crown | |
411 | Revenue Third Parties | |
26,884 | Total Revenue | |
26,533 | Expenses | |
351 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: VIP Transport Services |
|
|
– | Revenue Crown | |
8,006 | Revenue Third Parties | |
8,006 | Total Revenue | |
7,936 | Expenses | |
70 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) |
Vote National Archives
2011/12 Appropriation and Funding | Appropriation funding transferred for 2012/13 to: | |
---|---|---|
Multi-Class Output Appropriation: Archives Management and Policy Advice | ||
Output Appropriation: Archives Services |
|
|
20,271 | Revenue Crown | |
510 | Revenue Third Parties | |
20,781 | Total Revenue | |
20,261 | Expenses | |
520 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice |
|
|
382 | Revenue Crown | |
6 | Revenue Third Parties | |
388 | Total Revenue | |
323 | Expenses | |
65 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Regulation of Public Sector Recordkeeping |
|
|
3,559 | Revenue Crown | |
127 | Revenue Third Parties | |
3.686 | Total Revenue | |
3,743 | Expenses | |
(57) | Net Surplus/(Deficit) |
Vote National Library
2011/12 Appropriation and Funding | Appropriation funding transferred for 2012/13 to: | |
---|---|---|
Multi-Class Output Appropriation: National Library Services | ||
Output Appropriation: Access to Information |
|
|
28,856 | Revenue Crown | |
6,207 | Revenue Third Parties | |
35,063 | Total Revenue | |
33,246 | Expenses | |
1,817 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Collecting and Preserving Information |
|
|
22,327 | Revenue Crown | |
610 | Revenue Third Parties | |
22,937 | Total Revenue | |
21,716 | Expenses | |
1,221 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Library and Information Services to Schools |
|
|
16,032 | Revenue Crown | |
197 | Revenue Third Parties | |
16,229 | Total Revenue | |
15,395 | Expenses | |
834 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) | |
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice and Statutory Servicing |
|
|
870 | Revenue Crown | |
10 | Revenue Third Parties | |
880 | Total Revenue | |
720 | Expenses | |
160 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) |
Vote Racing
2011/12 Appropriation and Funding | Appropriation funding transferred for 2012/13 to: | |
---|---|---|
Output Appropriation: Policy Advice – Racing |
|
|
202 | Revenue Crown | |
2 | Revenue Third Parties | |
204 | Total Revenue | |
149 | Expenses | |
55 | Net Surplus/(Deficit) |
Footnotes
[43] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[44] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[45] Identity Services customers are asked to assess the quality of the service they received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[46] Identity Services customers are asked to assess the quality of the service they received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[47] Identity Services customers are asked to assess the quality of the service they received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[48] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[49] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[50] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[51] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[52] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[53] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[54] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[55] Customers are asked to assess the quality of translation services provided on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[56] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[57] Satisfaction was measured on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[58] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[59] CDEM Group stakeholders and training course attendees are asked to assess the quality of services and information received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[60] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[61] ICT Ministers Group, ICT Strategy Group and ICT Council members are asked to assess the quality of advice and support received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[62] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[63] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[64] Stakeholders are asked to assess the support received on a five-point numerical scale.
[65] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[66] The Minister is asked to assess the quality of the monitoring service received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[67] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[68] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[69] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[70] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[71] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[72] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[73] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[74] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[75] Ministers are asked to rate their satisfaction on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[76] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[77] Ministers are asked to rate their satisfaction on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[78] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[79] Ministers are asked to rate their satisfaction on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[80] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[81] Ministers are asked to rate their satisfaction on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[82] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[83] Ministers are asked to rate their satisfaction on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[84] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[85] Ministers are asked to rate their satisfaction on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[86] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[87] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[88] Venue inspections are conducted as a part of a target risk-based programme aimed at addressing the highest-risk non-club gaming machine societies.
[89] Training course attendees are asked to assess the usefulness of the training received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[90] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[91] Sponsoring Ministers are asked to assess arrangements on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[92] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[93] The Minister is asked to assess support services provided on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[94] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[95] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[96] Commissioners are asked to assess the quality of support received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[97] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[98] Statutory body members are asked to assess the quality of support received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[99] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[100] Statutory body members are asked to assess the quality of support received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[101] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[102] Gambling Commission members are asked to assess support received on a five-point numerical scale.
[103] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[104] The Local Government Commission is asked to assess the support it receives on a five-point numerical scale.
[105] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[106] Statutory body members are asked to assess the quality of support received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satsfied, Poor, Very Poor.
[107] Please refer here for a comparison of output and revenue expenses for 2011/12.
[108] Statutory body members are asked to asses the quality of support received on a five-point scale: Very Good, Good, Satisfied, Poor, Very Poor.